Talk:Thomas Forester/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Morningstar and portfolio link to dab pages.
 * The lead is very blunt, and does not introduce the subject; instead it jumps straight to "details" and heads on the main stuff later.
 * No-where in the text is there any indication of what country he comes from.
 * P/E is not understandable, because the first occurrence does not have the abbreviation in brackets.
 * I have not made a full review of the prose.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Not checked.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * There is only an estimate of the year of birth, no place of birth, no information about education, and hardly information about his career prior to the 2000s.
 * The article is dominated by recentism.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The article is not imaged.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article lacks fundamental information expected in a biography article. It is not possible to pass the article as GA without much more content. I will therefore have to fail the article. However, except for the lead, what is there is good. Keep up the good work :) Arsenikk (talk)  22:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The article is not imaged.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article lacks fundamental information expected in a biography article. It is not possible to pass the article as GA without much more content. I will therefore have to fail the article. However, except for the lead, what is there is good. Keep up the good work :) Arsenikk (talk)  22:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)