Talk:Thomas Goolnik

Untitled
I find the multiple edits made by 149.18.42.68 on 1 December 2015 quite interesting. They all appear to add editorial/opinion content. It might be good if someone could scrutinize them. 213.202.124.181 (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I wrote the original, I think I wrote it in a fair way, and agree that the edits add an editorial slant that favors the subject of the article. But I don't want this to become my personal crusade. It would be nice if someone else would pick that up. Pgramsey (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes this article seems to be the focus of a reputation management effort. Metalliqaz (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Looks like it happened again...
See: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181003/23545140776/thomas-goolnik-gets-google-to-forget-our-story-about-him-getting-google-to-forget-stories-about-thomas-goolnik.shtml 24.20.239.63 (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * And again: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190320/09481541833/thomas-goolnik-again-convinces-google-to-forget-our-story-about-thomas-goolnik-getting-google-to-forget-our-story-about-thomas.shtml --Ehitaja (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)