Talk:Thomas Graham Jr. (diplomat)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Shandy89 (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)I went back and made some changes to the beginning section. Most of this article is written by myself. It was the beginning that I did not remember to edit. I hope it works now. If not. I will work on it more until the problem is resolved. I do not have the intention to violate any copyrights. Some of the information needed for this article will sound copied because the 4-5 websites that I have referenced to almost all have the exact word phrasing themselves as well. It is difficult to write about this person's many positions and not have it sound like it is copied. Unless changing the order of the positions help.

Requested move 30 January 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  12:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Thomas Graham Jr. → Thomas Graham Jr. (diplomat) – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The diplomat does appear to be more prominent and the hatnote at the diplomat's article points to the football player. Anyone typing simply "Thomas Graham" will find both men among the 20 entries at the Thomas Graham disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support 363 v 298 isn't a big enough difference, probably redirect back to Thomas Graham.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 10:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)