Talk:Thomas H. Friedkin

Copyright problem removed
Portions of this article duplicated and closely paraphrased other source(s). The material was copied from http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2001/1008/118_print.html http://www.gstcareers.com/history.htm and http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/09-01-2005/0004098478&EDATE=. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Original research
In whose value judgment is it appropriate that this man is described as audacious? If we are citing a source, we need to attribute it. Making such judgments ourselves is disallowed by our neutrality policy and our policy on original research. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This description is cited to Forbes magazine; I have added this to the lead. Not sure whether it belongs there at all, but if it does this is the NPOV way to say it. Terraxos (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)