Talk:Thomas Johnson (botanist)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: I've placed the 1892 DNB content here as that seemed to me just marginally preferable to reducing the page to "Thomas Johnson was an English botanist". However, that content is well antiquated and needs to be totally rewritten. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)