Talk:Thomas Keiser

High School sex scandal
(removed unsupported allegation) Not posting this information wouldn't create a true representation of him on this page and wouldn't accurately portray a proper BLP wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.178.28 (talk) 16:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 128.211.178.28 (talk) 16:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You haven't provided any reliable sources that confirm it is him. The blog is not a reliable source.--Yankees10 16:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The media can't publish a minor's name if he refuses to testify or press charges, please tell me the best way to include the information while still adhering to Wikipedia's policy on BLPs. Just because he refused to testify or press charges, you can't just ignore the fact that this happened! 128.211.178.28 (talk) 16:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know what else to tell you. You might want to ask at Help desk and see what they say you should do.--Yankees10 16:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand what you're saying, but I'm just confused about why you are so quick to delete information that lacks citations but you can't help me find a way to put the facts straight on the article. Do you not agree that this, if properly cited, belongs in the article? Without this information I fell that this article isn't properly porting Keiser's past which is a shame because Wikipedia is all about transparency of free, correct information on a world wide scale. 128.211.178.28 (talk) 17:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Found source with all the information contained in the report by the AAUW, which is a very reputable organization existing for more than 100 years. 128.211.171.53 (talk) 18:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Alas - your source, ain't. Collect (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Neither of the sources you added mentions the name Thomas Keiser. Please do not re-add any such allegations unless you can provide reliable sources that state the names of both parties involved. Please note that forums and blogs are not considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. Moreover, Wikipedia has very strict rules when it comes to the biographies of living persons and any contentious or negative entries must be backed up by 100% waterproof sources or they will be removed. Continuous adding of poorly sourced or unsourced allegations will be treated as libel and may get you blocked from editing. De728631 (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)