Talk:Thomas Lound/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments That's it, nice article. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "painter John Thirtle. He was popular" Lound or Thirtle?
 * "watercolourists" can we link?
 * "landscapist David Cox. His etchings" whose? Cox or Lound?
 * British Newspaper Archive links should be marked as.
 * "the Artists' Conversaziones in the" what was that?
 * "his life. died" something awry here.
 * ", whose influence" maybe "although his" in the context of this sentence?
 * "He became an accomplished" Lound became..
 * "prolific watercolourist" link that here too as well as in the lead.
 * "working life.[22][14] He" ref order.
 * "c.1832" space between c. and year.
 * "c.1850" ditto.
 * "Lound (1802-1861)." en-dash for year range.
 * "1802-1861: etchings" likewise.
 * Eight external links? Is there anything in those which could be added in via inline referencing?
 * Is there a good subcat of Category:Watercolorists which could be usefully added?
 * All the above comments have been addressed and hopefully sorted, but it's worth pointing out that Nominating_good_articles says WP:EL isn't within the GA criteria. I've removed those external links that added little to the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, there's a whole lot not in the GA criteria, a lot of what I do is to give good advice which often extends beyond GA criteria, but I don't enforce it. Thanks for taking it into consideration.  Good to go. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)