Talk:Thomas McPherson Brown

Footnote 3 should be removed. It is irrelevant to the topic. There is no mention or reference to works of Thomas McPherson Brown in that article. If someone added it because there is no reference to Brown or his work, that is hardly proof to support the statement that is footnoted as thousands of others whose work is in the field of RA are likewise not mentioned in the article. It seems like someone added it just to be able to have a third footnote. LRGACD (talk) 13:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

I am new to this site. I am not sure how to add information or references. But I did see the flag that references are needed for this article on Thomas McPherson Brown. Here is a great article written by Harold W. Clark, PhD, who worked with Tom Brown and wrote the book Why Arthritis?: http://www.arthritistrust.org/Articles/Thomas%20McPherson%20Brown%20MD%20Treatment%20of%20Rheumatoid%20Disease.pdf

or

http://www.arthritistrust.org/Articles/Thomas%20McPherson%20Brown%20MD%20Treatment%20of%20Rheumatoid%20Disease/index.htm

Jason22175 20:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Jason


 * Marking up references is described at WP:FOOTNOTES. The above links though would not consitute appropriate peer-reviewed journals suitable under the WP:MEDRS guideline. Better would be find sources at PubMed (some of the articles in the given link state over 200 papers on the topic, so how many are listed by PubMed selection for suitable biomedical journals ?). The relevant PubMed abstract numbers could then be inserted into Diberri's tool to generate the Template:cite journal markup for one. David Ruben Talk 01:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)