Talk:Thomas Pownall/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 16:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'll review this article for GA status, and should have a full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 16:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I'm seeing a combination of British and American English - both traveled and travelled, for example, and honor and honour.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * In the infobox of File:Thomas Pownall.jpg, it says the licensing is based on author life + 70. However, the tag is based on pre-1923 publication. I think the infobox is correct, but either way, it needs to be fixed so they both say the same thing.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am passing this article GA nomination. I found two minor niggles on prose and images, but neither are significant enough to hold up the nomination. Very nice work, Dana boomer (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * In the infobox of File:Thomas Pownall.jpg, it says the licensing is based on author life + 70. However, the tag is based on pre-1923 publication. I think the infobox is correct, but either way, it needs to be fixed so they both say the same thing.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am passing this article GA nomination. I found two minor niggles on prose and images, but neither are significant enough to hold up the nomination. Very nice work, Dana boomer (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I took care of the little things. Thanks for the review!  Magic ♪piano 01:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC)