Talk:Thomas V. Morris

Untitled
Thomas V. Morris is an important educator, author and thinker. His books have important significance both in academics as well as in the business realm. An administrator accused me of spam by putting a referral link on the links to his book, but as I explained elsewhere this is not true. Anyway, this is like fighting a losing battle so I give up!--Rwphan 08:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

By the way, I will wait for the administrators' decision before continuing. It is disheartening that texts can just vanish without proper checking from administrators!--Rwphan 08:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, I have added a few more details for this man. Hopefully others will help and contribute more.--Rwphan 07:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I am a atheist/agnostic (somewhere inbetween)-- this may sound silly but I have read and reread Tom Morris's "Philosophy For Dummies" and was impressed by the intellect that seemed to be in the book. Importantly, I was awe-struck about some of his stories of seemingly supernatural events that he knew of that he talked about in the book. This has led me to wonder if he is an honest person, or if he is playing scam. I have not made up my mind on this yet, but I recently ordered his "The Stoic Art of Living" to see if this can sway me one way or the other.

Any one who has opinions please post.

Psyadam 20:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Adam Henderson 3/16/07

"The Stoic Art of Living" is a good book. Morris presents the key concepts of Seneca, Epectitus, and Marcus Aurelius...as related to living one's life. Kenneth Kloby (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment
I just wanted to point out that this wiki page looks to me like self-promotion

I am new to contributing to wiki but I’ve used it for a long time and I value the neutral information

This page does not look neutral to me

I have done some brief reading of Tom Morris and he is trying to sell books and his philosophy is pro religion WikipedeASH (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Deletion
I think this page should be placed for deletion. Not only does it appear to be self-promotion, it is riddled with nonsensical errors. I translated this page from Hindi only noticed that most of the article jumps between discussing many different topics. It appears to discuss an Indian man, surname Mirsha, to an American man with the surname Morris. I cannot click any of the sources to verify as they are either dead or inaccessible. CherriGasoline (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I now see that this page was vandalized. I have corrected it to the best of my ability and retract my previous statement. CherriGasoline (talk) 07:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)