Talk:Thomas de Buittle

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * jackturner3 (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I've attempted to address thy concerns. Inform me if this isn't enough. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 01:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on these changes, I hereby promote this article -- jackturner3 (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * jackturner3 (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I've attempted to address thy concerns. Inform me if this isn't enough. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 01:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on these changes, I hereby promote this article -- jackturner3 (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on these changes, I hereby promote this article -- jackturner3 (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)