Talk:Thor: The Dark World/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Prashant! (talk · contribs) 03:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

First, Refrences. Checkout if all the refrences are consistent. In some, publisher's name is wikilinked but, other's don't link. — Prashant 05:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Done. -Fandraltastic (talk) 12:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Now lead, this sentence seems too long...split it into two sentences. "The film was directed by Alan Taylor, with a screenplay by Christopher Yost, Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely,[3] and stars Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Stellan Skarsgård, Idris Elba, Christopher Eccleston, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Kat Dennings, Ray Stevenson, Zachary Levi, Tadanobu Asano, Jaimie Alexander and Rene Russo."— Prashant 17:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You can say...It stars Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman and Tom Hiddleston. With.....(the rest) in supporting roles. Or something like that.— Prashant 17:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Plot section is very large. It needs some trimming (if it can be done). More than the required rule.— Prashant 17:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Split that lead sentence in two. The plot is 638 words, well within the suggested range. -Fandraltastic (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Why predecessor is linked at second/third occuring and not at first occuring?— Prashant 18:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Reception


 * It shouldn't be linked at all, removed it. -Fandraltastic (talk) 18:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Too much quotes all over the article, some of them should be paraphrased especially the whole production and marketing section.— Prashant 18:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Some of them are paraphrased, and there's no guideline against using direct quotations. -Fandraltastic (talk)
 * I agree, the use of quotations in this article is well within good article standards and quite a few of them are paraphrased.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I didn't mean that all should be paraphrased but, at least 2-3 from those two sections. Its fine if you don't want to change it. Other than that the article has no problem.— Prashant 01:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Pretty good effort overall, thanks for addressing the points.— Prashant 01:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)