Talk:Thought-action fusion

=Entry assessment= Any editor can subjectively assess any entry. The more editors specify classes for the quality scale and importance scale (in the above templates), the more the specified classes will become consistent/representative. You can help to assess this entry through these synthetic instructions. Psychology  Psychiatry 7e8y (talk) 12:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * specified the quality scale:, and importance class:   (on YYYY-MM-DD);

I have trouble understanding this passage
"False beliefs from self-confusing mind-wandering about biased interpretations of intrusive thoughts are painful."

I have read a lot of things, and it's uncommon that I don't understand the point of a phrase. I don't understand what's the idea conveyed to the reader. I assume this is an attempt at summarizing the topic, except it is very dense and opaque. A reader who doesn't understand the underlying topic, can't make sense of this passage.Gamma1138 (talk) 21:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Gamma1138 completely agree, I'd try rewriting it but I don't know what it's saying in the first place Merlin04talkcontribs 02:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Too much jargon in introduction?
The introduction section to this article has a lot of jargon which makes it very hard to understand (for example, what does the phrase "imaginary latent egodystonic desires" mean?) - someone (ideally with knowledge of the subject matter) should clean it up a bit. Merlin04talkcontribs 02:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)