Talk:Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995

points are great
it would be great for examples (links to cases where the point is well illustrated) for the lists of points of the operation of the act - doesnt have to be every one, even just a few would break the potential it looks like another public servant has grabbed their act and put it here verbatim trap - the potential for footnotes/links to illustrate the functions or the issues at stake would make it unique and much more encyclopediac - there are heaps of stubs about government authorities with lists of things and not a footnote or link in site addressing any of the points JarrahTree 11:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * wow well beyond the usual repository of authority rules or principles - excellent! JarrahTree 14:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * thanks for your great examples. MargaretRDonald (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * not very pleased with the way they have gone in - maybe a different section for actions that have had the act specifically mentioned in cases, and the plans and draft proposals in a another - and actually addressing what they involved rather than being tacked on... but thats just being picky with my own edit - and not asking anyone else necessarily to do the thing.. JarrahTree 15:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * careful reading /or knowledge of the context of the range of items in https://trove.nla.gov.au/book/result?q=NSW+Threatened+Species+Conservation+Act+1995+%28TSC+Act%29 - suggests something close to a novella - there are elements of the responses to the act and its ramifications JarrahTree 15:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)