Talk:Three (Tubeless Hearts album)

Fair use rationale for Image:TH Three.jpg
Image:TH Three.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Wiki quality
Added {Wikify} and {POV} tags - this article currently smells of fancruft bollocks - self promotion. Prove me wrong, if you will.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Firstly I find your tone highly objectionable and disrespectful, not to mention inappropriate. The "Three" article merely provides information about a bona fide release, which, although released some 14 years ago, featured in the 100th edition of PowerPlay Rock and metal magazine in a retro review, July 2008, as it is accepted as a collectable AOR album, currently fetching high prices on the net. I see no reason to decry this article with fatuous commenst, simply because it hasn't sold as many as Madonna. There is further justification for its inclusion because it features Graham Oliver from Saxon as a guest artist. – Mikiaboom (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I've removed the POV template (it is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article) because the discussion about its neutrality have stopped for more than a year. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 20:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)