Talk:Three Weird Sisters (band)

Untitled
Got a "quick deletion" message within minutes of creating the stub, claiming that Three Weird Sisters was somehow insignificant, while, Ironically, the even more obscure band "Wyrd Sisters" was somehow NOT considered insignificant?
 * Because that article asserts notability, whereas this one does not. Leuko 05:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

You might take the time to note that the canadian band article (INCORRECTLY) has a link to THIS band's website (reference section, #3). So obviously "Three Weird sisters" is notable enough to be confused with "Wyrd Sisters" in it's own article, so for the purpose of clarification, at the very least there should be a cross-reference, or BOTH should be deleted.

Ah, so you agree with that, at least...
As I note that you removed the erronious link, it seems likely that you have essentially agreed with me on the point that the two groups are easily confused.

Since "Three Weird Sisters" was directly affected by the lawsuit cited in the "Wyrd Sisters" article since they were, at the time, in negotiations with Warner Brothers (as can be seen by following the reference link that I added to the stub and clicking on the "NOTE TO DISGRUNTLED HARRY POTTER FANS" link in red at the left side fo their website) then at least minimal cross-referencing is indicated if the Wyrd Sisters article is going to be kept in Wiki...since they ARE two separate groups, I don't see how it would make any sense to simply add a 'not to be confused with "Three Weird Sisters"' to the Wyrd Sisters article, with no accompanying article about the OTHER group.

Redwood Elf 06:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Recent edit (Added references. Added a little history. Tidied up a bit.)
The article mentioned two nominations for Pegasus awards. I couldn't find the second. If anyone can, please add it.

I added a little bit of history about the band members. Some might feel this excessive for such a stub. Feel free to edit or reorganise it. --AJanuary 10:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)