Talk:Three certainties/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BencherliteTalk 12:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Reading this is bringing back painful memories of university days...
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm sure you're planning to write about Express trusts in English law, but at the moment it's an annoying redlink right at the start of the lead – can you link for the time being to express trust? Apart from that, and the minor tweaks I've made, I think this is ready for the badge. BencherliteTalk 12:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to have painful memories of oxbridge :P. I've got to write a few other things first, but yes, express trusts in English law is certainly a target. Still waiting on those Stack articles, btw :P. Ironholds (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm sure you're planning to write about Express trusts in English law, but at the moment it's an annoying redlink right at the start of the lead – can you link for the time being to express trust? Apart from that, and the minor tweaks I've made, I think this is ready for the badge. BencherliteTalk 12:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to have painful memories of oxbridge :P. I've got to write a few other things first, but yes, express trusts in English law is certainly a target. Still waiting on those Stack articles, btw :P. Ironholds (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to have painful memories of oxbridge :P. I've got to write a few other things first, but yes, express trusts in English law is certainly a target. Still waiting on those Stack articles, btw :P. Ironholds (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)