Talk:Thrikkunnathu Seminary

google video
Google videos are not reliable sources. I have removed text and links to Google video from this talk page following WP:BLP. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

NPOV
Editors of this article must please read the following. As per Wikipedia rule every article must follow a Neutral Point of View. We the editors should not be trying to impose our own point of views in this article as it in a encyclopedia. The views of both churches should be put up here just like in the Catholicos of the East article. Please share your views. --ܠܝܓܘ Liju  ലിജു לג&quot;ו (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC) --ܠܝܓܘ Liju  ലിജു לג&quot;ו (talk) 07:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I am once again requesting the editors of this article to discuss the different opinions of the different editors here. Please don't revert this comment.


 * Please look at it this way: Editor opinions on this topic are more or less worthless. Only reliable sources will do. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

protected and stubified
I have stubified and protected this article owing to overwhelming BLP worries, an utter lack of sources, unencyclopedic bent, unclear writing and edit warring. All content in this article must be cited to a reliable source, abide by WP:BLP and be neutral in outlook. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

unprotected
User:Lijujacobk has noted the following sources:


 * http://www.hindu.com/2006/01/04/stories/2006010422740400.htm
 * http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/17/stories/2005081709780400.htm
 * story at expressbuzz.com

I have unprotected the article but please heed, any text must be wholly neutral and carefully follow the sources (those above or any others which show up), with inline citations. Moreover, if names of living persons are put in the text, great care must be taken to abide by en.Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. Also please mind, YouTube, other user-uploaded videos and blogs are not reliable sources and cannot be put into the article or even posted here on the talk page. Edit warring is not allowed and I may block any user who does so. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Removing other editors' comments
I've mentioned this to various people involved on their talk pages. On looking at the revision history of this talk page, I see that I need to repeat my words more strongly.

Do not remove other people's comments from talk pages unless you are an administrator.

An admin should now go through the history here and restore all the removed material in an appropriate way.— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  12:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Echoing S Marshall:


 * Do not remove other editors' comments from this talk page.
 * Add your own comments only at the bottom of posts which have come before, do not mix your comments into the comments of others.
 * Sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ). Unsigned posts may be removed on sight.
 * Do not refactor (re-arrange or re-organize) posts on this page in any way.
 * Posts which violate the BLP policy will be removed. Editors who repeatedly violate the BLP or talk page policies will be blocked from editing. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

content
Going by the reliable sources now cited in the article, both the seminary and church have been closed for over 30 years. I've rewritten the text following the two cited sources. Any unsourced content will be removed. This article is not an Internet outlet for the PoV, advertising or claims of any group. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Thoroughly sourced and written up from scratch. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

protected
I've protected this article from editing owing to blatant unsourced PoV flogging and likely BLP violations. Editors who cite sources here may gather consensus on this talk page for further edits to the article. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)