Talk:Thriller (viral video)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is very interesting. You seem to have done a good job. The main problem is that it does not have a bolded opening sentence in lead. Please see LEAD to see the rules for opening sentences. I stuck a sentence in temporarily as a place holder, but it needs fixing up. Otherwise, I am still reading through the article. You seem to have done a good job of combines sources and rewording the information. I am not sure if two Fair use images can be justified, but that can always be debated.

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 23:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your fixes, they were very helpful. :) As you suggested, I've done a slight rewording of the opening sentence. I've also removed the second fair use image, and it has been deleted under F5 of the speedy deletion criteria.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 08:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I am not sure of the purpose of listing Discipline and Punish under See also, as I question its relevance to rehabilitation through dancing. (This, of course, is not a major point regarding the GAN.) &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 15:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed. It was in the article before I cleaned it up.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 15:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * At first I was concerned that you did not have the usual sections, such as "Development", "Release", "Response", "Aftermath" etc. but in looking through the sections again, I have decided that for now the heading adequately capture the contents within each. Refinement of the sections might be something you can consider for the future. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 15:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll definitely try.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 15:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

 Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Good job. Congratulations!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced  b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Covers the context and major aspect b (focused): Remains focused on topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.: Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): The one Fair use image is justified b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): The one Fair use image is justified b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 15:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yay! Thanks. :)  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 16:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)