Talk:Thrive Global

NPOV.
I know this will be HEAVILY patrolled by Huffington Post employees and it may never be possible to accurately represent this, but Thrive Global was originally pitched almost as a religious cult, it sounded very much like Scientology. Even far left media bias websites like https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/thrive-global/ list this as strongly biased and a 'left wing conspiracy'. You know when everyone, left right and centre, list it as a whacky cult there's something afoot given that even things like NVXIUM weren't considered as bad as Thrive is. But how do you go about realistically addressing this when a megacorp owns this company and has more employees to astroturf and defend their weird religion? Because this is so NPOV it wouldn't be surprising if it's literally written by a PR agency at this point. But there's no point in me making an account and trying to make it less biased because it'll just get insta-reverted. What can be done? 2001:8003:3647:C000:5974:8102:7075:2238 (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Yeah for sure. When the founder of this company wrote a negative post on Linkedin about Elon Musk and his "failure" of managing Twitter only three weeks after his purchasing the company, I knew this was a crock. The very last place on earth for sensationalist political bashing is LinkedIn. I was surprised to see someone of such high regard dribble mainstream far-left rhetoric, on a platform designed specifically against it. I wonder what will ultimately come of such a firm which possesses a leader that has lost all sense of professionalism, enough so to drag the muddy boots of social media tribalism into the heart of the bastion of professional networking that is Linkedin. 72.223.114.171 (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)