Talk:Thrivent/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 04:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

If there are no objections, I'll take this review. I'll note at the outset I've had no role in editing or creating this article. I welcome other editors at any stage to contribute to this review. I will spend a day familiarising myself with the article and then provide an assessment. Kind regards, LT910001 (talk) 04:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for waiting. In conducting this review, I will:
 * Provide an assessment using WP:GARC
 * If this article does not meet the criteria, explain what areas need improvement.
 * Provide possible solutions that may (or may not) be used to fix these.

Commentary

 * This article has outstanding tags, and an unresolved merge tag. There is an 'expand section' tag indicating this article is not suitably broad.
 * Several statements in this article are unsourced. Additionally, many sources are from the website of said organisation, which impacts on neutrality (it is the use of these sources, rather than the content from the source itself, which does this). Sources should be secondary sources, meaning that they are are not associated with the thing they are describing.
 * This article contains a large amount of images of different buildings. I would suggest remove one or two for readability, or place them in a gallery format for readability, but this will not impact on GA promotion.

As it stands, I do not believe this article is ready for GA status. I will be happy to discuss this review and would encourage re-nomination when these issues have been addressed.--LT910001 (talk) 00:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Conclusion
It has been a week and no changes have been made to the article or response from the nominee. I would encourage renomination when the above items are addressed. Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 06:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)