Talk:Thug Behram

Picture
The Picture is of Late Ustad Ziauddin Khan Dagar, a doyen of Rudraveena from Dagarvani Style of Dhrupad Music. He was a court Musician at Royal Court of Udaipur (A former Princely State in, Rajasthan, India). The original author of this article has published this image, without knowing its original personality. A sad day for Indian Classical Music. Anuvab.palit (talk) 08:39, 2 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuvab.palit (talk • contribs) 08:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Was he alone?
I don't recall the name of the book off my memory, but I read that the thugees were a group, and they conducted murders in groups, not just Behram alone. So, I wonder if he can be put into this list as the killer in all these cases. --Ragib 18:23, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

In "The Top Ten of Everything 1996" (ISBN 0-7894-0196-7, Page 65) they cite Behram as being convicted at his trial of personally committing 931 murders. It also says the cult itself is estimated to have killed upwards of 2,000 people. MrB


 * The Thuggee were known to have been active from the 17th to 19th centuries, until the British wiped them out. The death toll caused by the cult as a whole is uncertain, but estimates very from 50,000 to as high as 2,000,000 murders. 24.214.230.66 (talk) 04:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Manuscript sources
I have updated this stub to take into account the original source for the statement that Behram killed as many as 931 people. His statement has been read out of context and, in addition, his actual confession was to actively participating in the killing of no more than 125 people. Mikedash 14:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Contradictions
This article makes no sense, in the introduction it claims the number of murders to be in the 900s and then in the "analysis" this is reduced to only 125 killed by Behram. Shabba3001 (talk) 00:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Another contradiction (or at least missing information): If he was never tried for the murders, why was he hanged? --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Analysis
The whole "analysis" section is poorly written and speculative. If the speculation is on the part of verifiable sources, it should be sourced. If not, it doesn't belong here. I'm going to remove it. Rees11 (talk) 23:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Here's the removed text:


 * Attribution of so many killings to this one murderer is, however, the product of confusion and mistaken reporting of unchecked statements. The original source for Behram's 'confession' is a manuscript on Thuggee written by James Paton, an East India Company officer working for the Thuggee and Dacoity Office in the 1830s. Paton's manuscript - now in the British Library - states that Behram had merely estimated that he had "been present" at 931 cases of murder, the killings themselves being committed by a gang of 25 to 50 men, at least half a dozen of whom, other than Behram himself, would have played an active role as stranglers.


 * In addition, Behram's statement is unverified and Thug never stood trial for any of the murders he confessed to, having turned King's Evidence and agreed to inform on his companions.


 * It should further be emphasised that this Thug gave a second, much less publicised, account, concerning the actual number of murders he committed. At another point in Paton's papers, Behram is quoted as saying: "I may have strangled with my own hands about 125 men, and I may have seen strangled 150 more".


 * Since Behram's alleged murders were committed in the course of a 50-year career, and since it was in Thug informers' interests to make themselves appear as important as possible to their British captors, it is not certain whether any specific total number of killings can be attributed to this one murderer.

Rees11 (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Serial killer?
He doesn't seem to meet the definition of serial killer as it is used here on Wikipedia. Rees11 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Sources and Expansion
This article is way too short and needs to be expanded in far more detail than what it currently has. Information pertaining to Behram's early life, time in the cult, murders, arrest/execution, and legacy should all be added to the article with proper citations from reliable sources given for each piece of information. Considering how prolific Behram was, it's sad to see this article in such a state of underdevelopment. There is plenty of information on Behram than can be included from the article on the Thuggees. I will include a list of sources that can be added to the article at a later date. --Paleface Jack (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)