Talk:Thukral & Tagra

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:13, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Notability?
I am interested to cleanup and improve this article, but I see some notability issues. Since you've added a notability issue tag, I would like discuss more on this and clear off any notability issues, before getting on to work. These are the sources under consideration;. With all these I'm inclined to say the articles passes WP:GNG. Your thoughts please, KCVelaga (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , this looks to me like undisclosed paid editing, and has done since long before this version of the page was created (paid shills for both ArtPlural and NatureMorte wrote most of the previous version). At a quick glance, the sources here are poor; commercial galleries such as ArtPlural are obviously not reliable sources – they're in the selling business, and will say whatever they think might help them make a sale. The same applies to a Danish print-retailer, and the blog source is no better (that's surely a gallery press-release). Unless you've identified some other, more solid, sources, I'm not sure that it would survive AfD. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, thanks for clarifying. KCVelaga (talk) 06:49, 20 May 2019 (UTC)