Talk:Thunder Run (Kentucky Kingdom)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Moswento (talk · contribs) 12:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello! I'll have a look at this one. Comments will magically appear below soon. Take care, Moswento talky 12:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Overall
 * Overall this is very very close to getting the pretty green symbol. The prose is much cleaner than other articles I've reviewed recently - good work! Mainly, there are a few things that are in the article that I don't think should be, and a few things that aren't in the article that probably could be. Once my comments are addressed, I would be delighted to promote this. Take care, Moswento talky 12:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * How does the article look now? I think I have addressed all your issues. Themeparkgc   Talk  05:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for making the changes, all looks good. I'm pleased to promote this to GA. Keep up the good work on these coaster articles! Moswento talky 09:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Themeparkgc   Talk  22:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * Should Thunder Run be in italics at the beginning (and in the title and infobox?)
 * "will reopen in May 2014" - how certain is this? Would "scheduled to reopen" be better?
 * "will reopen in May 2014 with Kentucky Kingdom." - the "with Kentucky Kingdom" is a bit awkward. "when Kentucky Kingdom relaunches under new ownership".
 * "wooden roller coaster " - do we need the words "wooden roller" here?
 * The lead should contain something about the coaster's reception


 * History
 * This AP article mentions two technical failures in the ride soon after its opening. Worth adding?
 * "Thunder Run operated until the end of the 2009 season on October 31..." - This paragraph contains excessive detail about the park negotiations, which isn't directly relevant to the ride. Most of the text could be cut, and the History section made into a two-paragraph job


 * Characteristics
 * "features a ride duration of approximately 2 minutes." - should this be in the present tense? At the moment, the ride duration is non-existent!
 * "named the Hurler." - "both named the Hurler" would be clearer


 * Ride experience
 * I assume there's nothing really to say here about ride theming/station etc.? From the photos, and the archived promo description, I'm guessing not...


 * Reception
 * I think this section could be expanded with more about its reception in the early years of its operation, i.e. when it was most appreciated. Some digging on GNews revealed:
 * This article from the Lexington Herald-Leader says: "In fact, "Inside Track," a magazine published by the American Coaster Enthusiasts, rated Thunder Run, the park's wooden roller coaster, as the fourth best of its kind in the nation."
 * This article from the Indianapolis Star says: "Riders reach 70 mph on the coaster, which was ranked No. 1 among the "Top 10 Most Terrifying Roller Coasters" listed in 1993 and '94 by "Amusement Business" magazine."
 * I also found a more moderated modern view, perhaps suggesting that the coaster has not aged so well: This 2007 article offers a moderated view: "The moderate ride: Thunder Run. One of two wooden coasters in the park, it's got a few nice drops and that jerky, clicking wooden coaster feel that some people love, but it never gets too wild."
 * "In Mitch Hawker's worldwide Best Roller Coaster Poll" - as a non-specialist, I'm left wondering "Who's Mitch Hawker? And what's this poll?" I know other articles have passed without this, but I really do think this poll needs to be given a context, in particular who votes, and what numbers we're talking about.


 * Sources
 * Footnote 16 is a dead link - not necessary to fix for GA, but would be nice all the same