Talk:Thurlow House

Excessive personal info on Marjorie Thurlow
a relative has contacted me to request removal of personal information about Marjorie Thurlow's personal life. Although it's sourced, it does look too much, since she's not the primary topic of the article. --99of9 (talk) 06:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Their personal history seems largely irrelevant to the history of the house. Can someone check my diffs and see if it still hangs together. 99of9, can you check with the relatives to see they are happy. Kerry (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 07:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. This content was overly excessive / personal. Thanks for bringing to our attention. I also plan to 'tone down' Harry Seidler. The fact that he's linked and there is a date attached to the development doesn't require editorial that he was "the dynamic up-and-coming young [architect]". Simply, "architect" will suffice. Rangasyd (talk) 10:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)