Talk:Thus have I heard/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 22:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

I will review this in the next week or so.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  22:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I look forward to it.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 21:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I came down ill the last few days.. Sorry for the delay! I'll get to this review this week definitely.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  23:51, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, great, !-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 07:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

I apologize that it took me so long to get to this. For the most part, this is a very well-written, interesting article. I did some minor copy-editing/moving stuff (here), and if any of that rubs you the wrong way, feel free to revert. What follows are some issues/suggestions:
 * I'm a fan of including a reference after every incidence of quotation. I'd recommend doing so after "could by itself quite adequately explain it" just so we're clear where that is coming from.
 * ✅, you're right, that's how it should be done.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * "Indologist Konrad Klaus [de] disagrees with Brough..." This comes a paragraph after Brough is discussed. Is there a way to rearrange this so that it immediately follows Brough's introduction? I think that would be a bit more logical.
 * I have merged the two paragraphs. Will that suffice?-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * That reads better.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  14:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * "Religious Studies scholar Mark Tatz disagrees with Galloway's interpretation, however, though Galloway rejects most of Tatz' arguments." This is a confusingly worded sentence. I'd recommend re-writing, or breaking into two smaller sentences.
 * ✅.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * What is the publisher for Klaus 2007?
 * ✅.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Totally option suggestion: add location for the book references.
 * .-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 07:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

That's all I can find. Putting on hold.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  21:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Good job! Thanks for the speedy turn around (and again, sorry about my slow delay)! This is a very interesting article and I'm happy to see it promoted.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  14:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks!-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 15:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)