Talk:Ti sento

Hardstyle?
Even though the UTROTT album IS considered hardstyle, this single obviously does not fall into that genre. I changed it to "hard trance".
 * It's hard to classify. I'd say it has elements of Hard Trance and Jump. Enchanted Bunny (talk) 12:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

This is wrong
""Ti Sento" is a single by German techno group Scooter, based on the 1986 song of the same name by Italian group Matia Bazar." This is not how this should be done.

The article should be about the original hit. The Scooter-version should then either be mentioned in it's own section, or have it's own article.

But the article should start out with something like:" "Ti Sento" was a single by Italian group Matia Bazar..." Greswik (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. The Scooter version isn't even the first cover version. There is also a version from 2005, albeit probably not as well-known. There may be others, but I'm only mentioning a version I've heard myself without doing any research into it. I only stumbled upon Scooter's version while trying to find the 2005 Verona one, so I don't think it's one of Scooter's most famous hits. Perhaps Undue weight is applicable here. I suggest either having the original version on top or having two separate articles, with the original song here at Ti Sento and the Scooter version moved to Ti Sento (Scooter single). /Jiiimooh » TALK – CONTRIBS 02:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * So I was bold and made the lead about the original version. Let's see if anyone has any objections. I believe the article should also be moved to Ti sento (lower-case s). /Jiiimooh » TALK – CONTRIBS 20:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Think Scooter's version was mostly inspired by this hardstyle track. Enchanted Bunny (talk) 11:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Original research in "Music video" section
The information about the type of rifle doesn't seem to be relevant or verifiable enough. (My attempts to search for more information mostly produced Wikipedia mirrors.)

More importantly, the second paragraph of that section looks questionable from "The video was inspired by..." onward. Any objections if I remove this original research? SoledadKabocha (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)