Talk:Tiber Oil Field/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk)  23:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Placing on hold. Arsenikk (talk)  23:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Specify that it is the US sector of the Gulf. (fixed)
 * Use of dashes and hyphens isn't quite right. See WP:DASH. (fixed)
 * There is a single Wall Street Journal link which is dead. I've removed it. (fixed)
 * Bloomberg is a disambiguation page. (fixed)
 * I've removed a WSJ entry from the external links because it is a preview for a subscription page, and adds nothing as an "external link". ELs must (unlike references) be fully accessible to the general public. (fixed)
 * I am uncertain about the value of the external links. ELs should provide information sources which cannot be provided in the article, of copyright, space or other restrictions. If there is information in these articles that could supplement the article, instead add it too the article.
 * There is no information in the article about Petrobas and ConocoPhilips' partial ownership in the field.
 * I jumped in and cited the Petrobras/ConocoPhilips co-ownership.  H aus Talk 00:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am accepting the reasons for there not being an image in the article, as it is very difficult thing to make a picture of.


 * A number of these are now marked as "fixed". Is the only issue left, the external links? Is everything else okay? FT2 (Talk 15:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That is correct. Arsenikk (talk)  15:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The 2 external links are worth mention in the article. I've added a sentence or 2 using the new pages as references, and removed them as external links. (diff). Hopefully that also fixes the EL point and all is okay now. FT2 (Talk 19:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk)  19:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)