Talk:Tidbits

Influence
The publication is described as "influential" - and indeed, this would be the basis for inclusion in Wikipedia. But the two external sources cited are to a review of a single book by the publisher, and to a blog post about a single review by the publication. Neither makes any statements to suggest that TidBITS is influential or well-known; instead they stick to discussing the individual review and book. Further support for the importance of this publication is needed to keep this article up. Milara (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Capitalization of “TidBITS”
I don't understand why the title of the newsletter that is the subject of this article — TidBITS — is rendered in the title of this article, and throughout the text of the article, as Tidbits, with only a passing comment that the newsletter title is “(styled TidBITS)”. It seems to me that it would be more accurate and straightforward, and less confusing, to simply use TidBITS (capitalized thus) in the title and body of the article. I’ll wait a month or so to allow time for someone to present a good reason why such a change would be inappropriate. If no objection is expressed by then, I’ll make the change. — Jaydiem (talk) 02:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)