Talk:Tiger Woods/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Result was Keep--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Notified: WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Golf,,, , , and .--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

As part of the GA Sweeps, I have reviewed this article against the good article criteria. I find in excess of a dozen paragraphs without any citation. This means that the article either needs to be reorganized or that there are many distinct topics without any references. I am a regular watcher of this page. I check all editorial changes at least twice a week. I am very aware of how closely this page is watched and have full expectation that involved editors will uphold this GA status. Please don't let me down.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delist - Problems go deeper than a simple lack of citations. I counted 14 sources that I would consider questionable, plus several others from his official website. This is Tiger Woods. It shouldn't be rocket science to come up with good references for someone who has been written about as much as him. I would also like to see his 2007 and 2008 seasons take up less space, to avoid any hint of recentism. The trivial nickname at the end is not helping either. I'll try to dig up some more cites, but other changes will also be needed.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 16:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Leaning toward Keep It is down to six paragraphs without citations and is continuing to improve. I will check back in about a week.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the article may not be perfect, but it has greatly improved and is well-deserving of being kept.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)