Talk:Tim Bennett

17:32:28, 25 April 2018 review of submission by Magdalena Wisniowska
Dear Legacypac,

I would be interested to know which references/citations you found particularly objectionable on my Tim Bennett draft wikipedia page. As sources, they are all secondary, the publishers are reputable and they consist of more than two paragraphs about Bennett's work. Tim Bennett is a well known contemporary artist in Munich and I write this as someone who works in the field (with a doctorate in visual culture) but unconnected with the artist (I encountered the artist's work during an Art Research conference, where all work was peer-reviewed). The artist's catalogues are part of the German National Library.

Artists less well known than Bennett, and also based here in Munich, have their own wikipedia page, for example, Benjamin Bergmann, with a comparable amount of secondary sources.

Thank you in advance for your help, Kind Regards, M

Magdalena Wisniowska (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm going to accept based on this. It was an edge case in my mind anyway. Legacypac (talk) 21:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Lead section
This has now be adjusted. (Magdalena Wisniowska (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC))