Talk:Tim Lovejoy

Vandalism
It is quite hilarious and frankly brilliant that certain individuals - more likely an individual - continues to attempt to vandalise this talk page and its associated article with unsourced and potentially libellous vandalism. Please refrain from doing so, and consider making some useful contributions to Wikipedia rather than using sockpuppets on a single page.  DJR  ( T ) 01:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Is this a reference to the Martin Freeman Interview on Soccer AM? Funny, I can't find footage of the interview on YouTube, and I'm certain I've seen it there before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.254.158 (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

I apologise
I am the serial vandal who has been reeking havoc on this article. I am ashamed of my behaviour and please accept my condolences. I will never vandalise this page again.

Sorry user:gwernol, user:djr xi, user:guinnog, user:redvers.

NOT!!!!!!

Jacobsalino 11:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Football turncoat
Why does somebody keep removing the sentence that Lovejoy has been criticised for being a "turncoat" amongst 6-0-6 listeners? Anybody who has listened to the show when Lovejoy is hosting will know that this is a continual bone of contention and that many many listeners have rung in to comment on it. It is not a slur on the man, just an accurate description of the reaction of many of his listeners on his show. Stillmans39 (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

MySpace profile link?
Should this page include Tim's MySpace profile link - www.myspace.com/timlovejoy ?

He's got a great blog on there, and definitely something fans would be interested in reading...

CharrisonlineCharrisonline (talk) 08:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Critique not possible?
Wikipedia is not a fan site -- and thus I assume that any critique this person has received from an authorative source deserves inclusion. Lovejoy's book on football was critically badly received by an authorative magazine, WSC. I included this critique, but it was removed. I am reinserting it yet again. --Punavuori (talk) 13:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)