Talk:Tim Roxborogh

Speedy deletion
As the creator of this page I'm surprised to see it recommended for speedy deletion. I'm happy to rewrite it to avoid it being 'promotional'. Is anyone able to point out what is promotional about the article? -Joshuacouch (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't see a neutrality issue with the prose, although sometimes editors get a bit trigger happy with articles that don't clearly meet notability guidelines. Some of the sources are themselves at least partially promotional and should be replaced with better ones if possible, but I think that marking this for G11 speedy deletion was not the correct call. signed,Rosguill talk 23:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Notability
While I think that there's enough secondary content outside of pure Q&A across the interview articles to let this article out of the new pages queue, the article as written doesn't cleanly establish that the subject meets WP:GNG. signed,Rosguill talk 23:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)