Talk:Tim Shell

Sources etc
Since this existed, I thought I may as well improve it. I used Board of Trustees as a source. For reference, three members of the Board have already been on VfD. See Vfd/Angela, VfD/Anthere, and VfD/Jimbo. Angela. 21:52, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)


 * And this is the perfect example of systemic bias on Wikipedia. This is the kind of article that can't possibly be treated objectively on Wikipedia.  Nathan J. Yoder 22:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

If anyone is reading this page, note that the two boxes at the top are not duplicates, he has edited as Tim Shell and as TimShell (he must have changed his username some time). MichaelBillington 04:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Not deleting it doesn't harm anybody, but...
does anybody really think this can grow to more than a stub? Not intending to troll here, I like the idea of people tributing tim with an article. It's just I'm really curious about whether there's anyone who really expects this to become a real encyclopedic article. (PS: having the same thougths with angela, anthere & timshell) --euyyn 03:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I like this useless eternal sub-stub. It will be another "Pokemon precedent", to illustrate how low-notable and content-free articles are kept. In part because any of the pokemons is more notable, being known by millions, unlike BoT member with exclusively in-wiki notability.
 * BTW, I also like beer. --CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 12:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't know Tim, or any other BoT members, I'm just a random editor. I think this stub should be deleted, unless we can expect future sections to be written to generate a ToC. Move the content to a section of Wikipedia history, or something. Xaxafrad 17:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

"epicurian"
Is he an Epicurean in the classical sense or the modern sense? I'd suggest that we add a qualifier concerning which it is for the sake of clarity, if the correct qualifier can be determined. Sdr 07:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)