Talk:Timandra Harkness

Blatant publicity article
Was she born? When? Where?

Does she have parents? Is there basic information about them? What?

A Family? Relationships? What?

Does she have a personal life? What?

Etc.

This is not a biographical article, but a publicity article. Very poor quality control, Wikipedia, once again. It is such lack of editorial oversight, allowing anyone to use WP as a publicity vehicle, that makes Wikipedia fall far short of any aspirations to be an actual encyclopaedia.

Such articles should be removed, immediately, until sufficient material is assembled to create proper article. Of course this would fail in many cases when the person is not of sufficient note, as is so often the case. In an actual encyclopaedia such an article would be laughed at and not even considered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.197.156 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

One introductory and one unsubstantiated Education sentence
The introductory sentence 'citation' references a minor mention in a Brazilian online publication, which is likely a sentence provided to the publication by the subject herself and thus would be an unreliable source.

The Education sentence is unsubstantiated and does not mention dates. In fact no dates are mentioned other than cv-related dates, which are nearly all from very recent years, with a solitary exception. No information about birth location or date, parents or background, family, relationships or children - all standard material in a biographical article.

The rest of the article and the 50 citations are transparently a cv.

Suggest deletion of article unless substantial biographical information is provided to replace excessive cv-centric citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.19.206 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)