Talk:Timbral listening

help with clarifying
any clues and feedback as to what is confusing about the article would be helpful and much appreciated. Cotton32 (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything at all confusing or unclear here, so have remove the tag. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Neologism
The deletion of an article you created, Timbral Listening, has been proposed for the following reason: Neologism with no asserted usage.

in reference to this - please see published references and further reading at the bottom of the article which use the term 'timbral listening'. Is this really a Neologism? or is there another one in the article? This is my first article and I have read all the help pages and tutorials but perhaps I am missing something? Any help would be much appreciated. Cotton32 (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

stub
in reference to this article being a stub and not containing enough information - extra information is being added over the next few days so please bear with me! Cotton32 (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, it's surely no longer a very short article and it provides context, which is why speedy deletion was declined. It might be challenged again in the future, though, on grounds of WP:NOTABILITY, to be either merged into Timbre or deleted. -- Amalthea Talk 17:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)