Talk:Time Life/Archives/2012

Connection to Time-Warner
I know that TimeLife is now seperate from Time-Warner, but they must have some kind of agreement, since every song on all the CDs I have from them is licensed to TimeWarner.Helzagood 12:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Nomination for Clean-up
This entire article does not even come close to being balanced -- I have suspicions that some curmudgeonly fool wrote the article after unknowingly signing up for a music club before reading the "fine print." This article should either be deleted, or receive a complete overhaul. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.205.187.6 (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC).
 * Seconded. The grudge paragraph doesn't list any sources for the supposed 'bad press'.  It doesn't belong here.66.82.9.70 (talk) 9 January 2007

Books
As far as I can tell, books are no longer produced at all by whatever entity now calls itself Time-Life. It might be worth including some info on how and when this came to be the case. Skookumpete 20:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Woodworking Series
This series seems to be rather popular on e-bay. A set of 19 recently sold for $120.00 and a set of 16 is now going for $115.00. Single books have been going for as much as 19.99. I would like to know how many books were in this series and what their titles are. I have a few already and in my humble opinion they appear to be good quality. A professional woodworker may disagree but I think they are good books for a beginner. Thundercloud556 (talk) 19:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Advertisement
This article is written as an advertisement for Time-Life, pure and simple. Just read it. 138.16.59.82 (talk) 00:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Its just an advertisement, read it all, and no one has even TRIED to clean it up in the past nine months. Delete it in my Opinion. Dappl (talk) 18:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Notable
These series sold in the millions. The book and music sets are highly notable aspects of american middle class culture from the 60's to the end of the millenium. The article needs a lot of help, but contrary to some more emotional pleas here, the subject does not deserve deletion. remember, deletion is for subjects not inherently notable, not for subjects where notability has not yet been clearly delineated by US. PS im willing to bet that a MAJORITY of modern U.S. scientists who grew up in the 60's would say that life science and life nature library were major inspirations to them.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.135.80 (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)