Talk:Time in Tolkien's fiction/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Artem.G (talk · contribs) 08:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey Chiswick Chap, I will be reviewing this article. The subject is thrilling, will be happy to assess it. Please expect comment in the next few days. Artem.G (talk) 08:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Turned out that you reworked almost all articles on Tolkien and Middle-earth; they are great, thanks a lot for it!
 * Thank you for the kind words, and for taking on this review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments
Few comments/question:
 * He built a process of Decline and fall in Middle-earth - Decline shouldn't be capitalized.
 * Fixed.


 * The cultural historian Modris Ekstein remarked that "rational man [had] undermined his own world" - Modris Eksteins should be a wikilink.
 * Good find, done.


 * and followed by the destruction of the two Lamps of Middle-earth and then  - can you please point me to what are these two Lamps?
 * Wikilinked.


 * Earthly Paradise: Lothlórien has been compared to the place dreamed of in the Middle English poem Pearl.[25] Miniature from Cotton Nero A.x shows the Dreamer on the other side of the stream from the Pearl-maiden. - who (or what) is 'A.x'? And please put a period after 'Cotton Nero'.
 * Fixed.

Thanks for quick response!

Few more comments:


 * An Adventure by Charlotte Moberly and Eleanor Jourdain can be linked to Moberly–Jourdain incident
 * Done.


 * George du Maurier (friend of James's) - is it important that he was his friend?
 * It's significant as it shows they were part of a network of writers leading to Dunne and then Tolkien. The network is cited to Flieger in the table and the text above it.


 * Updated version of James's The Sense of the Past; it cites Einstein's Relativity and seems to allude to J. W. Dunne's dimensions of time - I doubt that Relativity should be capitalized, but if it's to distinguish 'The Relativity' of Einstein from any other theory of the same name, let it be.
 * Fixed.

Apart from these minor comments, I think the article is really great - it's beautifully written, broad, cite good sources; images are nice and appropriate, and there is no copyright violations. I think it's indeed a GA, so once the latest suggestions would be addressed, I would pass it. Artem.G (talk) 09:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC) - many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)