Talk:Timebox

Untitled
Hi

I don't think you should merge "timeboxed" with "timeboxing". On my web site I link to the wikipedia "timeboxed" entry where I talk about my own software development approach. Linking to "timeboxing" wouldn't make sense and I would have to change my page. It's all about me! :)
 * Now who are you and why did Wikipedians follow your silly request not to merge two articles that are about the exact same thing? There's no "timeboxed" entry, only Timebox and Time boxing. Seems asinine but I'm probably missing the bigger picture, or the sarcasm, or the hidden agenda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.7.115 (talk) 22:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal
Reviewing the two articles Timebox and Timeboxing, it is clear that they are dealing with the same topic. Although strictly speaking the Timebox is the object which is used by the technique of Timeboxing, the two are inseparable. Given that the content of each is light and Timebox has been flagged with request to expand since June 2008, I would like to propose that if the Timebox article is not significantly expanded by April 2009, we move to merge the two articles. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)