Talk:Timeline of computer animation in film and television/to do

Look this ! http://imdb.com/title/tt0136748/


 * All that does is confirm the movie exists. The "trivia" item claiming that the film is the first 100% digital film ever made is NOT a reliable source, as you could have been the one who submitted it. However, the claim of being the "first 100% digital film" is invalid, as (even if you exclude Toy Story, which you shouldn't), that also leaves out the VeggieTales home video, and any of the Pixar short films. You need to find a RELIABLE source. TheRealFennShysa 17:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Reliable source ?  Nor the Wikipedia is a source that if can trust! After all of accounts any person can “affirm the absolute truth” more does not go to modify this wrong timeline, therefore elea she is made by Americans for Americans, who live in its proper realities. Nobody denies the importance of the Toy Story, but before writing a “absolute truth” it searches with impartial tenacity and either.


 * By reliable source, I mean an article in a reputable magzine, such as (in this case) Animation World or Cinefex that backs up your claim. All you've done is constantly enter that film with no corroboration, references, or proof of your claim. This is not an American vs. non-American issue, as Japanese entries share spaces on this page, and they've backed up their claims. You have not. You've offered nothing at all, other than a dogged insistence to ramrod the info into the article. And until I see some corroboration of your claims, I'm going to remove it, as nothing I've found from reliable sources backs up any claims you've made. TheRealFennShysa 21:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * It is really very dificil to find a site or magazine that is American speaking on the history of the Cassiopeia. This is a site of a museum of informatica back in Brazil: http://www.mci.org.br/historia/cassiopeia/cassiopeia.html


 * I have looked at the website that this person provided a link to using Google Translate (from Portugese to English). While the translation is not a hundred percent perfect, I believe I know what this person (with the IP address only) is thinking.  The website makes the claim that Cassiopedia, although not the first CGI feature film to be released, was the first CGI feature produced entirely in the computer, as opposed to Toy Story, which used laser scans of clay models as the basis for the wireframe character meshes (I actually recall seeing this on the Toy Story DVD special features).  However, despite this, I have to side with FennShysa on this one, as Toy Story is the first feature length (e.g. over 60 minutes) animated film using CGI, and I don't feel that the use of clay models diminishes that at all.  Just my two cents. --Green451 20:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I do not want that you it thinks that I am trying to take off the merit the Toy Story, is not this! But for if dealing with a “Timeline about cgi”, it lacks the first done film entirely digitally.  I understand of the following form, the shape process of a personage is very important for the film, he is one of the beddings of the cgi, and the Toy Story had one “assists not digital” in this part. This does not diminish the importance of the film, but on account of this you cannot say that it was made 100% digitally. The Cassiopéia did not have this “assists not digital”, 80 minutes done total in the computer.  It is fact, the Cassiopéia was omitted of timeline!!--Flávio_Ed 16:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)