Talk:Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (January–June 2018)

error: won't save ?!?

 * May 18:
 * U.S. Senators Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Warner (D-VA), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH) call for a rare multi-agency inspector-general investigations into the Trump administration’s failure to fully implement congressionally mandated Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act sanctions against Russia.

errors? 204.38.4.80 (talk) 00:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)


 * There is no citation, though. Theoallen1 (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

suggest per WP:ALSO links
Suggest re-adding per "Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense." of wp:also the links below, for the overwhelmed wp:Reader 21:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Links between Trump associates and Russian officials
 * Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)
 * Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
 * Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2017)
 * I reverted per common practice but I'm not opposed to adding them back. Theses links act as a navigation help, and they are already in the navbox. This is one case where personal preference clashes with site guidelines. — JFG talk 04:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

add "2018 Russia–United States summit" ?
Should the 2018 Russia–United States summit be added (after starts)? X1\ (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * what does that have to do with this page עם ישראל חי (talk) 22:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Only if it emerges that Putin and Trump discussed the investigations. Not on the official agenda yet. — JFG talk 11:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

more than one Trump Tower meeting with Veselnitskaya?
May 16 item has "The Senate Judiciary Committee discloses transcripts of Trump Tower meetings between Trump campaign figures and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya". Was there more than one Trump Tower meeting with Veselnitskaya? X1\ (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The item only refers to one meeting, and the transcripts are interviews of the participants, not of the meeting itself. I changed the wording to something more appropriate. Websurfer2 (talk) 01:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Unrelated items
The Trump Foundation should not be included in this timeline.Theoallen1 (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


 * We'll keep the Donald J. Trump Foundation item here and see if it is related later. We go by the RSs, not our POV.  23:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by X1\ (talk • contribs) 22:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You've got it backwards. The Trump Foundation story should be removed from this timeline until RS show that it's related to Russia. Haven't seen that being alleged yet. — JFG talk 22:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Cambridge Analytica / SCL Group
These items were deleted, but since the editor knows Cambridge Analytica/SCL Group and Facebook are part of the Russian interference investigation timeline, the deletion of these items is considered vandalism. The editor used an Edit Summary of "The Cambridge Analytica–Facebook saga is off-topic". X1\ (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Everything I removed is either exclusively about British politics, or about Facebook lawsuits unrelated to the Trump campaign or to Russia, therefore my "off topic" edit summary was perfectly correct. You have some nerve to call my careful edits "vandalism". How about you stop knee-jerk reverting everything I do? You've got a serious WP:OWNership problem with those timeline pages. They are not your personal scrapbook. Please show some willingness to work with other editors and, dare I say, WP:AGF. — JFG talk 21:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Addition notation, from Talk:Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2017): Restored item deleted with duel Edit Summaries of "Trim Cambridge Analytica coverage" and "Null edit to explain previous one: Cambridge Analytica did not work for the Trump campaign". As Cambridge Analytica in reality did worked for the Trump campaign, and this item shows the Mercers (Robert Mercer & Rebekah Mercer) direct involvement in their activities (less of a business than as a political arm), and the deleting editor knows Cambridge Analytica worked for Trump; this deletion (due to its ES) is considered vandalism when considered with these mass deletions. X1\ (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The Moment Sam Nunberg Realized He Must Comply With Bob Mueller - The Beat With Ari Melber - MSNBC.webm

Requested move 16 November 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved - creating dab page now - (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 01:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2018) → Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (January–June 2018) – Split due to oversized article, also see Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (July–December 2018) for second half of split. X1\ (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree to the split. There is still much to add to the article, and it is approaching Wikipedia limits for the allowed number of templates. Websurfer2 (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I also agree with the name change to reflect the truncated date range encompassed by the article. Websurfer2 (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.