Talk:Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (June 2020)

Are these protests really "ongoing"?
Especially in late June, this article seems to be a WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of anti-PRC news, like And even more concerning for Wikipedia's guidelines, there are unsourced allegations of sexual abuse against a 13 year old girl. Anyway, where is the actual news of people actually on the streets protesting? I guess the things here are thematically connected to the Hong Kong anti-establishment, but where are the feet on the ground? 체셔🐈 (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) "According to the Financial Times, Tokyo seeks to lure professional talent and business opportunities in order to boost Tokyo's competitiveness in East Asia. Japan could use this opportunity...
 * 2) "According to the International Chamber of Commerce, they stated a report which condemned Beijing of proposing the national security law in Hong Kong. They deemed it shocking..."
 * 3) "Alicia Garcia Herrero, a professional economist from French commerce firm Natixis, pointed out that Hong Kong would not be regarded as an international financial hub after the national security law."
 * I will not address the question in the title of this thread here, but focus on the contents of your discussion point. I certainly agree that there is (still) a lot of work that needs to be done on the article. I have culled a substantial number of paragraphs – shorter and a few quite verbose longer ones, which I considered to be of too little relevance to this article. A search for references to the statements revealed that there was also a significant part of "pro-establishment", so to speak, material, with sources including Xinhua and China Daily. Of the four particular issues that you raise, I have removed three but kept the one about Japan, as it may be seen as offering insights into the protests. --CRau080 (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Content of the information
Firstly, I'd like to apologize for contributing to so much irrelevant material. I also agree with some reasonable edits.

But concerning the HK Protest movement, the phase that the protests are located in is related to the national security law currently. A lot of sources or information which are deemed 'anti-PRC' sources have some outcome and some effect on how the protests are staged in Hong Kong today. They all seem to have an impact on the progress of the protests. A lot of these 'foreign' news and discussion, such as those from Pompeo, are also sourced and circulated in the Chinese title of the page as well. Therefore, I do not agree that all characterized as anti-PRC material must be removed and edited, since a lot of them further signifies and is closely related to the protest movement.


 * Thank you for your message. While the contribution of less relevant, or perhaps irrelevant, material in large amounts generally does create substantial "post-processing" work for further editors down the track, I don't find it objectionable if no ill intent was present. In my edits, I strove to keep the balance between "anti-PRC material" (if one chooses to use this description; I personally would not) and other material. At the same time, serious problems with the reliability of information from state-run Chinese media are well-known, and have been discussed on probably a number of discussion pages for other Hong Kong related articles. I admit that I only understand part of your comments, and perhaps not the main point you wish to make; Pompeo is still mentioned in the article. --CRau080 (talk) 19:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)