Talk:Timeline of the Fukushima Daini nuclear accidents

I can't tell difference between this and the two "see also" articles.
There appears every reason to combine them without delay, and no reason they should not be combined.

If not combined, an explanation is needed at the top of each of the three greatly-or-wholly overlapping articles tersely explaining what is the scope of each and why a need was seen to separate them.

Timeline of the Fukushima I nuclear accidents Timeline of the Fukushima II nuclear accidents Fukushima nuclear accidents 2011


 * I fixed 11 March, which did have the duplicated material. Thanks. -Colfer2 (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

merge
I think this article should be merged into Fukushima II Nuclear Power Plant. Most of the content here is already duplicated there anyway. (Both are short articles, so there isn't a clutter issue, unlike at the Fukushima I timeline.) Cesiumfrog (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. The article hasn't had any significant editing since April. I'm going to go ahead and do the merge. If anyone disagrees then feel free to undo it and we can talk about it.   Will Beback    talk    09:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Daini is the preferred English spelling. "Dai-ni" is a rare variant.
Daini 25,000,000+ Google hits.

"dai-ni" only 40,000 Google hits.

I don't know Japanese, and this article is in English for English readers.