Talk:Timeline of the South China Sea dispute

2017 Events
Well, 2017 is ending. No updates for the whole year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.83.103.209 (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Timeline of the South China Sea dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.philippinenews.com/read/latest-news/8067-vietnams-angry-at-taiwan-as-it-stages-live-fire-drill-in-the-spratlys.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Timeline of the South China Sea dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120811152125/http://www.washingtontimes.com:80/news/2012/aug/8/inside-the-ring-china-warship-grounded/?page=all to http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/8/inside-the-ring-china-warship-grounded/?page=all

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Statements of YASAY CORRECTED
So easy to take off Hague ruling.. If the regular WIKIPEDIA works around here, eplease reinsert these periodicals as footnote.. YSay is just new and didn't know much what he is to say in public.. He got booed all over the country then be had a moment of awakening.. Read his retraction... CHINA

http://www.rappler.com/nation/144089-philippines-black-sand-china-artificial-islands-dfa

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://www.rappler.com/nation/140235-philippines-says-imminent-talks-over-china-sea-row-unlikely

http://www.rappler.com/nation/138305-dfa-secretary-yasay-philippines-afraid-china

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/07/12/manila-wins-south-china-sea-arbitration-case-hague/86984274/

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/34369/scarborough-belongs-to-ph-old-maps-show

http://m.inquirer.net/globalnation/99689

http://www.rappler.com/nation/144089-philippines-black-sand-china-artificial-islands-dfa

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://www.rappler.com/nation/140235-philippines-says-imminent-talks-over-china-sea-row-unlikely

http://www.rappler.com/nation/138305-dfa-secretary-yasay-philippines-afraid-china

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/07/12/manila-wins-south-china-sea-arbitration-case-hague/86984274/

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/34369/scarborough-belongs-to-ph-old-maps-show

http://m.inquirer.net/globalnation/99689

Bebe0114 (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Chinese frigate Dongguan aground on Half Moon Shoal.jpg

Nobody should say it belongs to any country
The article has claimed all the islands belongs to Vietnam as if that's a fact. But multiple countries including Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines and China always disagreed. Where is the source that claims those islands officially belong to Vietnam and nobody else? It seems biased to take a dispute and make a bold unilateral claim like this. You can say it's associated but you can't claim it "belongs" to Vietnam. Nobody can actually say it belongs to any country as the dispute was never once firmly resolved for the past plus centuries. I have recently changed the wording from "belonging" into "associated by France". Because you can neutrally say those islands are "associated" with various entities and regions including a realm in Vietnam, but it's not neutral to claim it belongs to Vietnam, as there's no treaty or agreement that resolved this multi party dispute which is still ongoing. 49.186.227.219 (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)