Talk:Times Herald-Record

Untitled
My father always stressed that Record was the first cold type offset daily in the country. Apparently, there was an earlier weekly. I haven't checked this out. Who has a specific cite either way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baron Dave (talk • contribs) Um, yeah. Sorry. Still not used to Wiki. David E Romm 03:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

These guys are prominent? Al Romm, Manny Fuchs, Glenn Doty? In what circles? Says who? Their relatives?? I've never heard of them, and I worked for Dow Jones for ten years, and even read a couple of dozen copies of THR damned near cover to cover.....

Anybody you'd like to mention from circulation department? Carrier of the month maybe?

And is the local paper in Middletown that pre-dated THR "venerable?" I'd be greatly inclined to think the opposite is closer to the truth, but there is no supporting info to help me form any opinion at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.80.60 (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I think a fair amount of that was added by well-meaning ex-staff or interns. There's been a lot of POV edits that I haven't had the time to clean out. Daniel Case (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Times Herald Record cover 2005-10-03.jpg
Image:Times Herald Record cover 2005-10-03.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Record banners.jpg
Image:Record banners.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Employees
I think that Chris Spero Farlekas probably merits a mention in this list. His writing is cited as reliable sources in several Wikipedia articles, and it's sometimes handy for editors to have more than a name. There are multiple articles in THR that are about Farlekas, in addition to the many written by him, but unfortunately I can't read them on their website right now. I suspect (but can't be certain, because I can't read the articles) that the appropriate level of detail is a couple of sentences, rather than a separate article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)