Talk:Times Now

Cleanup
I have scrapped and cleaned up the article which is written from Newtbrain's POV

Please keep it encyclopedic. Sfacets 06:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

SEO attempt
This IP 212.150.97.3 keeps adding the link to watchindia.tv as the live streaming link. This link clearly doesn't carry live streaming and as such could be considered an attempt at SEO.

Request a suitable course of action. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Mistakes
Supreme Court has not awarded Rs 100 Crores to P B Sawant it has only refused the interim order of the Pune District court Times Now had to deposit Rs 20 crores and 80 Crores guarantee with the court not even a single rupee has been given to the Judge. The case is pending in the Bombay High Court Wire accused Times Now of airing an doctored Video which Times Now denied if someone is adding it back you need source other than Wire and Times Now. Wire is a party to this dispute Grebeenos (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Earlier I removed an error Press Trust of India have not fined Times Now.Grebeenos (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Puzzled Why are edits being removed
Times Now was launched in 2006 in partnership with Reuters is clearly sourced and this sourced by the Business Standard and by a book. It the most popular channel with highest viewership in India as per the Financial Times ,The Hindu and this book Supreme Court has not awarded Rs 100 Crores to P B Sawant it has only refused the interim order of the Pune District court Times Now had to deposit Rs 20 crores and 80 Crores guarantee with the court not even a single rupee has been given to the Judge. The case is pending in the Bombay High Court and the source is India Today and the Telegraph Grebeenos (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Now with your permission can I add when the channel was started that is 2006 and it was started in alliance with Reuters.Further Can I add it is India's leading channel and the most viewed English News Channel. as per the sources  as per  Financial Times ,The Hindu and also Financial Express] and BBC calls it country's top English-language channel. IF you want me to change the wording that is fine.Grebeenos (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * YOur changes have caused more problems than anything. You removed content because you don't like it, you added multiples of the same content, you removed categories. If your edits don't include such problems then they won't be reverted. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Puzzled*
 * My two edits did not remove any categories as far as I can see and   or added multiple content as far as I can see.

Wire
Your link does not confirm anywhere that The Wire is a reliable source. Stop misrepresenting the discussion. The Wire remains one of the unreliable sources that we have to avoid for subjects such as this. Capitals00 (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * On |this link WBG clearly stated that the wire ought to pass WP:RS under WP:NEWSORG .And is well accepted by other users who participated in that discussion. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The Wire is an unreliable source for anything "tangentially connected to politics, nationalism et al" by the very link you supplied, period. So you would do well to find a better source, that is, if the incident was even notable. MBlaze Lightning  06:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)