Talk:Timothy Lawson-Cruttenden

Bias?
This article is probably the worst one I have ever seen that relates to a living person. Many serious claims with no suitable citation. How should one ensure that it is improved quickly? PeterEastern (talk) 12:55, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Apologies for that. I failed to notice that a single edit had introduced the obvious problems which have now been fixed. I have removed the banners I added earlier today. PeterEastern (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing and notability
This living person's biography needs more reliable sources to base its content and indicate its subject is encyclopedically notable. Primary sources and self-publications by related parties alone are insufficient. Passing coverage in the role of a spokesperson is likewise not actually coverage of the subject. Here are some links that might lead to reliable sources giving substantial coverage:

FWIW, I've found the following that provide some information but that are not substantially about the subject (see WP:INHERIT). They all involve the subject as a spokesperson for litigants against certain protests, some of which may be noteworthy: Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 19:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Representing the BAA/Heathrow against Climate Camp protesters; the protesters won: ; and ; and
 * 2) Representing Oxford against protesters opposed to a research lab:  and
 * 3) Representing guinea pig farmers unsuccessfully opposed to protesters:  and