Talk:Tin Hat Linux

Design Philosophy
I was just chastised by the CorenSearchBot that I "violated" copyright by cutting and pasting from http://opensource.dyc.edu/tin which is my own site --- clearly not a copyright violation! I wanted to use a large chunk of that text as a starting point.

Virtualblueness (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I am pasting the following information from Copyviocore
 * If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License:
 * Explain this on this article's discussion page, then either display a notice to this effect at the site of original publication or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. These messages must explicitly permit use under the GFDL.
 * Note: Articles on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view and must be verifiable in published third-party sources; copyright issues aside, your text may not be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia.
 * If this text is in the public domain, or is already under a license suitable for Wikipedia:
 * Explain this on this article's discussion page, with reference to evidence.


 * Unless the copyright status of the text on this page is clarified, it will be deleted one week after the time of its listing.


 * Posting copyrighted material without the express permission of the copyright holder is a violation of applicable law and of Wikipedia policy.
 * If you have questions about copyright, see Copyright FAQ.
 * Those who repeatedly post copyrighted material will be blocked from further editing.
 * Temporarily, the original posting is still accessible for viewing in the [ page history].
 * You are welcome to submit original contributions
 * Hope this helps! -Gr0ff (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The copyright section of the site notes that information ios available under the Gnu GPL, we are ok to use it, and no contact with the federation is needed. – Toon (talk)  16:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability versus Time
How long does one have to establish notability before an article is removed/redirected? Who decides if an article has achieved notability? It takes time to grow an article from a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Virtualblueness (talk • contribs) 22:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The notability guidelines are listed here: Notability Guidelines. There is no timeline for this article to be merged/deleted. The header that someone placed at the top of this article is meant to notify other editors who are willing to do necessary work to merge, or re-work the article if necessary. If the nomination for deletion (see Articles for deletion) is placed on this page, then it would be up for discussion whether or not the article meets the notability guidelines.

-Gr0ff (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * AS A GENERAL (widely-accepted, but unofficial) RULE: A product or organization is notable if there are three independent results on Google for the product or organization mentioned in the article. This means that this page could potentially be considered non-notable (and then deleted) until Google supplies three independent sites referencing Tin Hat Linux. I hope this helps!

live cd
The common definition of a live cd (as also found in Live CD "A live CD, live DVD, or live disc is a complete bootable computer operating system which runs in the computer's memory, rather than loading from the hard disk drive") says nothing about mounting or not mounting anything from the boot medium. Also, Tin Hat Linux even _loads_ something (the boot image) from the boot medium → I rewrote this sentence: "Tin Hat boots from CD, or optionally from USB flash drive, but it is not a LiveCD in that it does not mount any file system from the boot device." Hth, 94.223.118.196 (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2013 (UTC)