Talk:Tin Tun

removal of verified and sourced content
I have referenced and sourced all that is in the article-the reference section at the bottom has been there since the article was created, those are the sources-everything in there is verified. Chris 20:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * In that case, please tag them accordingly. Okkar 20:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Facts
That the fellow is "one of the pioneers of the now-extinct Scouting movement in that nation" is not encyclopedic unless it can be sourced from an independent resource, and at any rate is not encyclopedic, it makes the article read like a fansite. Source it or remove it. Okkar 14:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That is a retaliatory edit for what I placed at Tin Oo. Knock it off, I did source it. Chris 17:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Somehow I dont see any citation. If you cannot source it properly, I suggest you remove it. No citation, No source, not credible enough to mention on wikipedia.  Okkar 18:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Tin Tun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050905124919/http://english.dvb.no:80/news.php?id=1487 to http://english.dvb.no/news.php?id=1487

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)