Talk:Tin selenide

Requested move 23 June 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 06:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

– Specification of oxidation state is customary, even if there is no equivalent tetravalent compound, because the +2 and +4 oxidation states are roughly equally common for tin. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 02:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Tin selenide → Tin(II) selenide
 * Tin telluride → Tin(II) telluride


 * I'd say that readers are more likely to find them and search for them by their current names. Check the references in our articles and you will find them either as tin selenide/telluride or SnSe/SnTe, but rarely as tin(II). Kanatzidis group's very famous Nature paper has tin selenide only as SnSe, and their recent paper calls it tin selenide. Many more similar examples. The fact that there is no tin(II) telluride redirect page (as of 2022-06-29) is also quite telling! Please KEEP current names. Ponor (talk) 06:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.